The Design of Atomization

You are now reading the Bluebonnet Gazetteer, a periodical primarily to advocate for a white, christian, and nationalist America, but may include any subject this author finds important to speak on. This periodical is published on a bi-weekly basis, and at the time this is being written only distributed digitally. I hope that in time this periodical will be an indispensable piece of regular reading for those youth who wish to reclaim and perfect our American nation.

I think apart from critique of the right, which is the most close threat to the regular reader of this periodical (see my previous publication), it is now important to discuss the malicious design of society as a whole. While the issues of the right are the most immediate, the full picture is only glimpsed by critique of it, the whole being found by continuing to follow the bread crumbs we found in our first investigation.

Here we must tread carefully. Many an investigator have attempted to follow this trail and either became stuck on one clue, declaring it the root cause since they can find no more, or went well beyond the end of the trail and declared the root cause to be the electron. I think it useful to imagine the nebulous, immaterial structures of society as physical things; so let us start with the first thing we notice and move carefully from there.

The first and most canvas-filling thing I notice here are these great mounds of worthless trash, that is, what our stores are stocked with and by virtue what our homes are filled with as well. Most objects used every day by the modern citizen are cheaply produced garbage that will not last the winter. The plates we eat off of, the clothes we wear, the gels we use to wash ourselves, overwhelmingly the physical things we interact with at all times are worthless and impermanent, but more damningly they're drab. The daily objects of the past were all made by hand, whether that be at your homestead or by an artisan, and because the time spent making them was far greater the creator would put thought into the object. Even if made poorly these every day objects would have a small imprint of someones soul, perhaps only shining through in a twitch in their hand affecting the carving process, or perhaps the entire design was given extreme care by the artisan crafting it. Whatever the degree of personability these objects created a grain in the daily experience.

But this trash heap goes further into what our minds consume. Societies of the past rightly took great care in what their minds consumed, the free marketplace of ideas would seem to them, rather than an evolutionary stage, a cesspool of disease of the mind. What children, and even lower class citizens were allowed to consume in the form of art and what ideological associations they were allowed to have was strictly controlled. This, of course, is seen as an abject evil today and said to be only so the ruling class could maintain power, that assessment would be entirely wrong. The ancients viewed consumption of the mind similar to a diet, that what was put into your mind would alter it for better or for worse. Now lets look exactly at what we do put into our minds today.

Most similar to the trash heap we have discussed so far is what we term 'slop', media that has no substance to speak of and is purely made for distraction. Slop is not to be confused with entertainment, entertainment is made chiefly, and sometimes only, to entertain whereas slop is made only to distract. For example, something like COD zombies is made to entertain, ideally you play it after your day is done as a way to have fun. It fulfills an important social purpose so that your day isn't so heavy or strenuous. Slop, however, is something like Tiktok or Instagram reels, it exists to use as a sort of time accelerant, existing to take up mental bandwidth during the day or during downtime to achieve a 'skip ahead' effect. In the framework I have constructed it is easy to see that slop media is used just like the rest of the heap to spread out value and reduce your mental capacity.

Looking at what we consume intellectually as a diet, slop is akin to fast or junk food, but there is another type of food that is presented by society, poisoned food. All throughout our media is sprinkled aberrant ideas that confuse and confound minds so that they remain obedient and willing to suffer disgusting, horrible things as 'normal'. The examples I have to choose from are plenty. For this article I will point out this one here, inheritance.

A particular theme I have noticed in popular media is a brown, whether that be male or female, character being chosen as the successor to a previously popular white character or a white male with a female, disney is particularly hellbent on this but other companies do it as well. This, just like commercials pushing race mixed couples, is to reinforce the idea in peoples head over and over until it becomes the norm, but in the pre-modern world a passing of the torch to a foreigner or a woman in male duties would have been disgusting. This tactic of conditioning is the poison food I speak of, it creates a false reality to make you act as they wish. In this example they want you to be comfortable with giving away YOUR inheritance to foreigners or be fine with handing the reigns of civilization to women.

There, esteemed reader, in the heap is something else overlooked when discussing the mental slop the masses gobble up from their troughs, these are mantras. In the west we may know of mantras as simple repeated phrases, but they go much deeper than that. In the eighth century of our Lord Jesus Christ, in Japan, a monk by the name of Kukai elaborated on what a mantra was in a clearer way than previous Tibetan and Chinese traditions had. The elaboration given was that mantras were an auditory manifestation of a deeper reality, that is when someone repeats a mantra they are bringing the most fundamental ideas at the base of reality to our level, then transmitting them to our mind so that we may understand reality better.

I do not believe this at all but this understanding is important to know how our western society uses mantras, particularly that latter part.

"-then transmitting them to our mind so that we may understand reality better."

A mantra will plant a reality in our mind. In the Buddhist (specifically some Japanese strains) view mantras exist to convey true reality but the dominant school of thought in the west does not believe in an objective reality, but rather strives towards making a reality of its own. So instead our society uses mantras to plant a created reality in our heads.

I will discuss this in much greater detail in a future publication but for today's purpose the effect of these mantras is twofold. Firstly to focus the mind with constant repeating ideas so that it can bear the otherwise entire lack of information in the real world, the lack of aesthetic beauty and the personal 'grain' I mentioned above. The second purpose is to push potential burgeoning creation of beauty out of our minds. A society where people take extra effort to add personal touches to what they create is one where excess value cannot be harvested but also one where people may become too attached to the world they live in and wouldn't just roll over when its swept away.

We have identified the first landmark in our search but now I would like to point to an overlooked clue we may have almost overlooked, this starving cow here. Rather, its the lack of grass is has to eat, in fact there is nothing to eat between the mountains of trash.

This lack of food is the lack of substance, lack of iterative things. I think many have commented on the lack of substance in what we consume; the vast majority of online and traditionally produced content has one purpose and that is to take up attention, yet unlike a (good) book or an informative documentary or a conversation with someone this time is taken up by nothing. It's noise that you are transfixed to until you break away from it spontaneously and realize four hours have passed. The lack of any real substance in this consumption leaves your mind unworked and unchanged, so to speak it becomes an empty stomach.

To explain what I mean by 'lack of iterative things' let us look to a village in the past and we shall see what I mean. In the past in a village every building would have been built by local hands, designed by local architects; clothes would have been made by the people in the village and many designs would be made by regional clothes designers; the plates and bowls and such would have been made and designed by local craftsmen. Also the language would be more regional, small tonal differences would display a character of your area and certain phrases could identify where you were from. Towns would have their own festivals that every citizen of the town knew and participated in and the details of which would come from locals. This is all to say that all the aspects of daily life would have the imprint and variability of tens of generations and thousands of local minds. Now? There are a handful of designers in any field across the whole nation of thirty million, many of which actively want to undermine or are of foreign variety. Buildings are made by companies based, sometimes, hundreds of miles away. Few towns have local festival traditions and those who do have dwindling attendance and often have lost region specific traditions for widely disseminated ideas.

These things are done so you are made, mentally, hungry. So that you will hold the cheap trash in high regard and so that you consume much of it, also it is so there is nothing to compete with the poisoned morsels they give you. If there is no other things to choose the common man will gladly swallow rat poison rather than starve.

We have established that the design of this place is geared to starve you then fill you up with garbage that is infinitely cheaper so that excess wealth can be extracted. Yet while discussing these things I've seen another thing to lead us to the exit of this maze, an apt phrase once I point out what it is. This clue I speak of are those walls against which the trash is piled and which the paths contour to. Come, let us follow these walls while I explain their purpose.

One may say that:

'Not all real value can be destroyed! Not yet! It has been made much harder surely but you can still trudge through this trash and gather enough real and good things to sustain you.'

To which the designers of this world have already responded with these walls. Like the trash heap these walls exist physically and in the abstract realm. Let us start, unlike before, with the abstract.

When discussing walls in the abstract I mean how the acquire of information is controlled. Everyone is aware of algorithms on platforms like Youtube, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, et cetera, but often I think even the people who are aware of them underestimate how influential they are, mostly because of how plugged into them they are. I became aware of this when speaking with people with after I sort of unplugged from social media platforms, they'd ask me about very specific things as if it was common knowledge. These algorithms, in conjunction with the trash heap that makes most of what you see inane noise, can use selective messaging to make you assume a worldview without ever questioning whether there are other worldviews at all. If every time you looked up there was someone there to hold a lens over your eyes to make the sky green, you'd never even think about the sky being blue.

Algorithms not only exist on media platforms, but the way you surf the web is controlled by an algorithm, search engines selectively show you websites, they present an AI summary, they show a little box off to the side sourced from Wikipedia, they have a question with a little dropdown that answers it, all things control what information you find without any need to get rid of other information.

But its not just the web, what the news presents and how they present it is another one of these walls, through their wording implanting subliminal messages about the things they are explicitly reporting on. Also what books are stocked in libraries, and not just what books are not included but what translations of old texts are in stock.

Even further, and back to the web, is control over messaging platforms. Everyone is centralized to a handful of messaging apps that have rules that allow them to ban people, this not only controls who you talk to but what you are willingly to say, what ideas you are willing to express, and that is another form of re-direction of information.

These barriers are put up outside as well, and not necessarily in the form of literal walls. Our cities are now concrete hellscapes, not even just the large ones, but many towns now are totally hostile to life and act as just places to do business. Many speak of the lack of third places but few realize these third places were typically informed by foot traffic flow. A good example of a third place like this is a plaza or a small park. The successful of these would be placed as places to move through then they would catch people for a while before they moved on, usually for lunch. Places like this reinforced a communal sense and attached citizens to their locale; when it is nice outside you begin to perceive it as home as well. But now we lack these places and further architecture is hostile to the flow of foot traffic, but also, architecture is hostile to your eyes.

Just like third places disappearing the ugliness of modern architecture is widely discussed, I love the topic but I wont go into the details here, instead, like everything else in this weeks publication, I will tell you the purpose to it.

Think of this, as we have established the online space is full of things we deem 'slop', highly stimulating content that is empty of value, but now focus on the highly stimulating aspect, if inside our homes we are constantly plugged up to devices that provide this overstimulation it is safe to say that our minds become accustomed to it. When you take a mind accustomed to this constant stimulation and thrust them out into an ugly world with no places to comfort them, would it not naturally follow that they would retreat back to that digital world? A digital world we have already established fine tunes what information you are given? I think you understand what the purpose of hideous architecture is by now, it is so that you do not connect with the immediate world around you.

I have outlined how the modern civilization is cordoned off, both outside and in terms of the intellectual and digital world; there is one place that is a perfect culmination of both of these designs, a university.

To clarify. I do not think the idea of universities is inherently evil or subversive, china has historically used them to great effect without them subverting the foundations of their society, even integrating them as a stabilizing force. The following is an analysis of specifically how they are used in America and the west as a whole in the modern world, though I will focus specifics on America's colleges, the broad idea can be applied to basically any university in Europe or the anglosphere.

College campuses have long been extremely instrumental in the control and dissemination of ideas. Of course it is easy to see how, most jobs require a degree of some kind, the college is how you get the degree, the college controls all the information you are required to learn and forces other classes that aren't directly tied to your field of work, anyone can make the connection. Also it is easy to have read what I laid out before and conclude that the college can be used to create forced consensus on certain things, but it actually goes much deeper than that, it has been much more hands on.

Throughout the fifties and sixties the CIA planted hundreds of agents and informants in student organizations across the United States, many of who would be ranked officers in the organizations. The CIA also used several proxies to fund these organizations; the main controversy of CIA involvement during this time was centered on their monitoring of the organizations for 'potential communists'. Further, from its inception the CIA has been closely associated with academics and used college campuses to groom promising individuals.

But I believe it goes even deeper than simply gathering information and poaching talent. In the nineties and early two-thousands the FBI infiltrated right wing organizations across the nation. During these operations many tactics were used to create leverage and exert control over these organizations. I would like to focus on two distinct approaches, the use of informants in positions of power and the use of informants to redirect non-associated radicals (those who aren't FBI associated).

To start with the latter the story of the 'first SS cavalry brigade' (I am not misspelling it like they did) is probably the most apt. To make a long story short a gang of almost entirely federal informants was formed to get criminal charges on one man.

The former approach I would like to look at one Joshua Sutter and his association with the 'Atomwaffen Division'. Joshua Caleb Sutter is a confirmed FBI informant who held a leadership role in the Atomwaffen, through his position he was able to get his books, Bluebird and Iron Gates, to be listed as required reading for new recruits of the Atomwaffen. These books prophesy a post-accelerationist future where roving gangs of aryans molest children. Joshua Sutter has long created cults of entirely incompatible religions, Satanism, Hinduism, Christianity, et cetera. It is possible that he is simply insane but I believe, rather, he is being used to perform the very ideology he writes about in his little O9A manifestos, that is, to subvert every cause and increase 'chaos', but I don't think this is because he's an honest Satanist, but rather that it is just the strategy used by the FBI to justify cracking down on these groups.

In contrast to these examples the CIA used similar tactics for a different result. If you replace the coerced criminals used by the FBI with professors friendly with the CIA, the connection naturally clicks. Professors are used to redirect prospective hires into assets that will perform the same function as the professors, act as conduits for ideas beneficial to the system.

These federal assets are disease spreaders. But not of biological diseases, rather memetical diseases. To keep it brief, think of ideas as living beings that transmit between people. When thinking in this framework it becomes easy to understand how colleges are used as the perfect culmination of this megastructure we have analyzed. The trash spreads out value, the lack of nutrition makes man hungry, the walls redirect man, and finally colleges are nodes at which man can eat food, knowledge, that is infected, detrimental to his free will.

But why is all of this done? What is the driving reason for this vast terraforming we have investigated? Where do all these clues lead? Dear reader I must thank you for following me on this investigation so far so I will finally tell you my conclusion.

Simply put all of this is to turn you into an animal so that you may be controlled. Man, when his basic needs are met, looks to higher things, he becomes more well connected, he refines his craft, he builds a network of familiarity and control separate from that of the current system. This very thing, for most which is simply living a happy self focused life, is poison to our system. If you are not starved, if you care about your home, you will not chase pleasure or shirk from pain and therefore are less easily controlled, more likely to resist.

Quite the daunting structure to topple, like the last article I will have a hard time in my prescription, but unlike the last article it will not simply be "wait for something". You can take some action now, and in fact, you have a lot of action to take going forward.

So to you I prescribe: Being now aware of the tactics used to reduce your mind to that of an animal's you must separate from this structure. The prescription is great in size so I will break it down into sections.

Regarding slop you must separate from short form content. I personally got rid of my cell phone entirely, but the point is to reduce the amount of noise you're jamming into your brain. With down time you will reflect on everything you have experienced throughout the day and become a much more aware person, with new silence in your mind you will be able to orient yourself more properly. This extends further to all things you use to distract yourself during the day, background music, shorts, scrolling social media, et cetera. It is all trash forced into your mind. This is not to say stop listening to music but try to make it a focused activity.

Regarding subversive media it is enough to be reflective of the purpose of what you are seeing. But further I would recommend hardening your mind against subversive ideas by building a basic philosophical basis. When you have a core guiding principle corrosive ideas do not have room to be slipped in. This defense also works against the many mantras.

Regarding physical trash I recommend bit by bit replacing the worthless plastic crap you use with antiques, also take time to learn about the antiques you buy, their history and how to care for them. Following this, study a bit and become aware of your home and what things you would really want in it. Expressing yourself in interior design creates a personal world that grounds you. Speaking of a personal world that grounds you only little can be done about the lack of places to tie you to your area, but still I would recommend on your days off, instead of always scrolling and gaming, walk around your area and explore.

The most important advice however is to remain calm and do not rush. Reorienting yourself will take time and it will be very quiet. A piece of recommended reading I'll give you, which is an antithesis of a design made to isolate you from life, is A Cup of Sake Beneath The Cherry Trees by Yoshida Kenko.

With this I end my triumvirate introduction. Going forward the articles will be a bit lighter and not as tangential to one another. I plan this periodical to run for at the very least a year or longer, hope to see you next time.