Conservatives & Reality

You are now reading the Bluebonnet Gazetteer, a periodical primarily to advocate for a white, christian, and nationalist America, but may include any subject this author finds important to speak on. This periodical is published on a bi-weekly basis, and at the time this is being written only distributed digitally. I hope that in time this periodical will be an indispensable piece of regular reading for those youth who wish to reclaim and perfect our American nation.

The "conservative" bloc is impotent. The persistent belief that ones entire life is solely in their hands has gone from a small growth, one that professes that elevating your position in life is possible through hard work, to a noticeable and malignant tumor, which spits vile poison at young men who even mention the fact that there is no feasible way to provide for a family, if they could start one at all!

This deep seated memetic poison has now frozen the majority of the American right wing into a state where no one will address the structural issues that are degrading the traditions they bemoan dying out. No meaningful change is ever proposed, and any suggestion that we must actually shape society to attain the ends we seek is met with almost more hostility than is given to the enemy. They are only capable of reacting to the left wing and fighting for popular policies they decided over a decade ago were "right wing", and of course for Israel.

Hereafter I will give three exhibits pressing issues for the most important bloc of citizens in this nation, young white men, and how this thinking makes these actual issues unapproachable for the republican party.

A common issue brought up in right wing circles is porn addiction, specifically among young men. This issue, moreso than a sign of something systemically wrong, is treated as an almost unforgivable personal moral failing by young men and is used to brow beat them whenever the obviously more corrosive issue of women's fornication is brought up. You will hear all sort of shaming and hen pecking that men need to "work through" this and oft time it will be used as a sort of equalizer if someone points out the imbalanced deal of a conservative young man having to settle with a roastie who "left it in her past." But this is only a strategy, one which I will elaborate on next article.

Instead, as I see it, the pervasive porn addiction afflicting young men should be looked at as a symptom of something deeper. Between 1978 and 1981 the Canadian psychologist Bruce K. Alexander ran an experiment with rats and morphine. He speculated that keeping rats in a sterile and cramped cage made them more prone to addiction. To test this he assembled four groups of rats that either lived permanently in a large communal cage with activities, lived alone in a typical lab cage, or switched between the two environments, in these cages rats had the choice between fresh or morphine laced water. In every case the rats that had been isolated were more prone to addiction, furthermore when rats went from a lab cage to the more comfortable communal cage with other rats they almost entirely dropped morphine water, and the rats who lived only in the communal cage were seemingly resistant to allure of the morphine water, trying it only occasionally.

Today young white men cannot expect increased future wages, do not have communities, as they were too pesky and isolated the replacement races, and cannot even expect to get a girlfriend, much less a lifelong loyal partner. These circumstances are far worse than the sterile lab cages yet those who would expect you to let them decide the fate of the nation expect young white men to simply be unaffected and act like they can still expect these benefits. This is not an excuse of porn addiction, it is a corrosive drug all the same like meth or gambling and young men should rise above it, but the undead neocons and the women who paint themselves with right wing colors are beyond stupid in their expectation.

As very briefly mentioned before not only is it rightly unexpected for a young man to get a relationship now, but holding one is an issue as well. You have heard countless times about divorce rates, ghosting, regular breakups, and this reprehensible, disgusting, evil thing being called a "situationship" (ie being a whore). The conservative bloc, those who would care if a migrant is legal or not, blame this on people simply not being old fashioned and, for some reason they could not tell you, abandoning the old morality. But people do not do things for no reason, as much as the cult of "progress" would like you to believe that things just change, change is in fact enacted by people. Ignoring that in their idleness the boomer generation upheld no real load bearing traditions, it is easy to point out that the laws passed in their time lead to the thing they lament, and these very laws they defend!

No fault divorce means there is nothing wrong with breaking a vow that includes "till death do us part," abortion means that there is no responsibility to usher in new life with the person you chose to sleep with to continue society, birth control means that sex is not a sacred act between a man and a woman whose souls are one but instead it is purely hedonistic pleasure, gay marriage means marriage is nothing, it means nothing anymore and is just a label, anti-discrimination laws means there is no group preference and that society is not built on its own iteration which you buy into so that it protects your blood, but instead is a cold equalizing force and economic zone. So how can you expect relationships to form and last when the laws society mandates act against such a thing?

When analyzed, the before complaint that the youth do not have "old fashioned values," in regards to marriage, seems entirely insane because the previous generations raised the youth to not even know what the traditions are. Yet once again they will hen peck men to simply pick up where they expect them to, to fabricate the thing they expect from thin air built entirely on nothing at all.

But to circle back to boomers not upholding any load bearing traditions, the newest generation of young white men and women have not been exposed to traditions which served the purpose of instilling in them morality and a preference for their own; they have endlessly been subjected to dogmas of equality and moral irreverence. Because of this there has been a deep hollowing of the soul that has left women insane and men melancholic.

Yet the older generations of the right wing, and those young who adhere to the GOP lines, usually mixed or hispanic, bemoan the loss of "American values" and make calls to "preserve our culture," but what culture? When pressed often these people will only be able to pin down manufactured propaganda from the late nineteenth century as the culture and values they want to preserve, but these were never the traditions settlers and early Americans passed down.

In Laws, and to a lesser degree in Republic, Plato explains that festivals and gymnasium are there to instill in the youth a sense of community and bodily health, but also they are there as lessons to instill morality in them, so that as they age and do critique society they are still rightly ordered. Instead the young whites of America from the youngest age are directly thrown into questioning their own society and anything resembling the gymnasium or festivals or analogous traditions are left entirely unknown.

Further this bloc of the right wing is openly hostile to many traditions of the home, that is furnishing, cooking, baking, gardening, et cetera, the things that enrich your dwelling and really give you a connection to it. They are also aggressive to any tradition of grooming (except the kind rich jews do), and they, through apathy and laziness, decay traditions that were unique to a single locale. Of all of these they lob insults of being homosexual or pointless or outdated, a very ironic insult; they will make excuses that upholding tradition takes too much effort or time or they take away from more 'productive' things. Then if they do do one thing, halfheartedly usually, they expect compensation for it as if traditions were merely capitalist exchanges of value.

How can we let people like this determine the direction of the right wing? How is it congruent that the 'conservative' bloc is so antithetical to actual tradition that their defining ethic contributes to the decay of the society they claim should be preserved? It is quite ironic that, in their rabid pursuit of extreme individual responsibility, they snatched up the benefits from a previous system, that did not believe this, then shirked any real responsibility of their own, now those they preach to about this ideal are left to be crushed under the collapsing roof of America.

But it would not do to simply address this issue, what use would it be? Instead I will at least try to prescribe some form of action to remedy it. A very daunting task, especially after my railing against the masters of "fix it yourself," but I do think we have a responsibility ourselves, rather a collective responsibility.

You, the reader, cannot "just do something" that will fix this issue, I think I made this quite clear at the beginning that I thought this. But to mirror that we can look near the end of this essay for some type of guidance. Those who spew the party lines have one great failing, they have not preserved the culture, they know nothing about it even!

So to you I prescribe: because to be right wing means to uphold and continue and defend the traditions of your forefathers, you must become a scholar of American society, and further European society, specifically a small facet of it, for now. Pick something from everyday life, no no too many of you are choosing video games, choose something else, and learn about it. Do not watch a summary on Youtube, preferably go to your local library, if you cant, web-surf obscure websites anything but centralized algorithm driven platforms, and pick a book from the nonfiction section about whatever you choose. There are innumerable things to choose from, cheese, ginseng root, lamps, painting, a genre of music, regional history, furniture, specialized electronics, architecture, public planning, organic gardening, a local art scene (in your area!), even if it died, and so many more innumerable options. Learn its evolution and nuances and how it inter-played with foreign iterations or iterations from other regions in America; the citizens of America have forgotten how deep and rich our culture is, remember it.

The Right is Run by Those who Hate You

It would be quite hard to believe that anyone who has spent enough time amongst the political discourse of the right wing has not noticed an incessant need to increasingly cater to foreign peoples and to satiate impulsive feminine urges. This, to anyone who takes the right wing at their word, should seem exceedingly odd since they profess they wish to return to a traditional way of life, the tradition they point to being extremely patriarchal and founded on European Christianity. Well it is no mistake or coincidence or by happenstance that the popular right wing is afflicted by this mad behavior, it is very intentional in fact.

As in the fashion of my previous, inaugural, publication I will provide three ways what I speak of manifests. Please pardon this developing formula, for my first articles are more systemic than my future ones, but I think to begin I must point out, carefully, what some readers have not noticed and make them more aware of other things as a result.

I think the second most obvious of my soon to be born examples is catering to non-white races. Naturally because those on the left wish to equalize and tear down all barriers, they are opposed to the white, who, because he is less numerous and only rivaled by the East Asians in terms of civilizational order, would have his entire history wiped out and be slowly mixed out of existence, or as is becoming more obvious if they, the left, got their way with no restriction, would be quickly and violently expunged from the earth with maybe some mulattos and captive women left as a memory.

Yet the largest force of alleged traditional values in America has done more and more to cater to the races the left wants to see sweep away the white. The right, identifying some shallowness in the left's care of other races, only seeing them as a tool for Marxist ends, proudly cried this observation to the whole world and out of a displaced sense of honor took it upon themselves to be the true ally of the non-white races, only thinking to do the opposite of the left.

At first it was merely declaring a stupid egalitarian ideal that we're all the same, then accepting a subset of the other races who were willingly to "join" the right, then it became unthinkable to be against miscegenation, then the right wing propped up non-white figures to argue polemics, then the GOP itself put more and more non-whites in leadership roles and won them office, and now an Indian is spitting on Americans while being a major "right wing" political leader. Many have rightly pointed out now that right wing leadership is more brown than the ruling councils in the democrat party, the GOP themselves wearing this as a badge of honor.

Something the mainstream right still claims they are "traditional" in regards to is women's roles, instead of, as before, wearing your replacements proudly as a laurel to be claimed, the mainstream right wing will try to deny and lie when it comes to their conceit to modern women, but make no mistake they almost do more for women than the Nu Americans.

Take close notice at how the right talks about having children. When it comes to policy right wing leaders can be caught saying they want to "allow" women to have kids, make it so that women can "choose" to have kids "if they want." They do not speak like the family is the most holy and sacred part of society, but an alternate lifestyle choice, as if our continued existence is like being a fan of Thrash Metal. This is because the right wing deftly and quietly makes way for women to act as men and to give in to all the modern urges they've been imbued with; does not what a society allows become what it believes? If a city built a plaza, it would be no controversial statement to say they want people to sit there.

This behavior reveals itself in many things the mainstream right says. They try to affirm that women are different yet weigh motherhood on equal footing with male pursuits, in regards to how the structuring of society should be handled for what women pursue. They allow women to become right wing figureheads despite proclaiming traditionality in a society built off a patriarchal religion. Most damningly right wing women are roasties, yet, are endlessly defended if a man is to ever bring this up, then the insult of virgin is levied at that very man! All in the name of grabbing up women as another part of the coalition.

Finally I come to the most obvious example that most of you were probably thinking of, the Jews. Whereas with Nu Americans they were boastful, and with modern women they were secretive, with Jews the modern right wing is fearful. I think to even a far left individual who stumbled across this article what I say is hard to disagree with. While the far right is wrought with Jew hatred the mainstream right is even more defensive of Jews than any of the left, who will at least criticize Israel.

I will keep away from mentioning generational shame in western culture of White-Jewish relations or holocaust shaming, these have been done to death. Instead it is much more salient to view this fervent defense of Jews in regards to the idea I have been sprinkling throughout this article, coalition.

The right wing strategy ever since the Obama presidency has shifted from the white christian majority demographic (a la Pat Bucanan) to coalition and reactivity. As the left got their wishes they spiraled further and further from natural civilization towards a nightmare society ran by a cult convinced of an eternal and ephemeral idea of "progress," until recently the end goal could not be explicitly named but it has always been the flattening of everything to equals, removing all hierarchy and mixing all things. But this creates reactionaries; the strategy of the right wing has been to grab up reactionary groups, no matter what ideal or past they want to preserve, and use them as momentum, and it worked! To get Trump elected. But this sort of thing makes not a sound basis to build a society on, and in fact continues us towards the goal the left has, but its red and slightly slower.

In truth this is why the mainstream right has ramped up their defense of Jews while at the same time the left criticizes them, besides obvious political ties between Israel and the current regime; the right wing is not a political bloc or a cult or a true political party, it is a strategy. The reason they attempt to squish blacks, white Christians, Jews, libertarians, free speech atheists, and so on all together in this big mass is because they're merely an automated strategy to game against an actual political bloc, the left.

This also explains why they so fiercely try to scrub those with an ideology from the 'party,' the strategy is reactive and so reacts to those attacking a member group of it. I hope you can see now why the article is named "The Right is Run by Those Who Hate You," because the moment you hold true ideals, the moment you advocate for your own and hold to an exclusionary ideal the right will attack you because you threaten its existence, yet, if you do not do this, if you do not try to push back the tide, you will be wiped from existence, so there is no reconciliation.

Unlike the last article the prescription for this one is much harder. Though like the last one a solution can be found within its words it is, similarly, not viable for you, the dear reader, to simply do yourself. Consequently prescription this time will be more vague.

So to you I prescribe: Hold on to hope.

The Design of Atomization

I think apart from critique of the right, which is the most close threat to the regular reader of this periodical (see my previous publication), it is now important to discuss the malicious design of society as a whole. While the issues of the right are the most immediate, the full picture is only glimpsed by critique of it, the whole being found by continuing to follow the bread crumbs we found in our first investigation.

Here we must tread carefully. Many an investigator have attempted to follow this trail and either became stuck on one clue, declaring it the root cause since they can find no more, or went well beyond the end of the trail and declared the root cause to be the electron. I think it useful to imagine the nebulous, immaterial structures of society as physical things; so let us start with the first thing we notice and move carefully from there.

The first and most canvas-filling thing I notice here are these great mounds of worthless trash, that is, what our stores are stocked with and by virtue what our homes are filled with as well. Most objects used every day by the modern citizen are cheaply produced garbage that will not last the winter. The plates we eat off of, the clothes we wear, the gels we use to wash ourselves, overwhelmingly the physical things we interact with at all times are worthless and impermanent, but more damningly they're drab. The daily objects of the past were all made by hand, whether that be at your homestead or by an artisan, and because the time spent making them was far greater the creator would put thought into the object. Even if made poorly these every day objects would have a small imprint of someones soul, perhaps only shining through in a twitch in their hand affecting the carving process, or perhaps the entire design was given extreme care by the artisan crafting it. Whatever the degree of personability these objects created a grain in the daily experience.

But this trash heap goes further into what our minds consume. Societies of the past rightly took great care in what their minds consumed, the free marketplace of ideas would seem to them, rather than an evolutionary stage, a cesspool of disease of the mind. What children, and even lower class citizens were allowed to consume in the form of art and what ideological associations they were allowed to have was strictly controlled. This, of course, is seen as an abject evil today and said to be only so the ruling class could maintain power, that assessment would be entirely wrong. The ancients viewed consumption of the mind similar to a diet, that what was put into your mind would alter it for better or for worse. Now lets look exactly at what we do put into our minds today.

Most similar to the trash heap we have discussed so far is what we term 'slop', media that has no substance to speak of and is purely made for distraction. Slop is not to be confused with entertainment, entertainment is made chiefly, and sometimes only, to entertain whereas slop is made only to distract. For example, something like COD zombies is made to entertain, ideally you play it after your day is done as a way to have fun. It fulfills an important social purpose so that your day isn't so heavy or strenuous. Slop, however, is something like Tiktok or Instagram reels, it exists to use as a sort of time accelerant, existing to take up mental bandwidth during the day or during downtime to achieve a 'skip ahead' effect. In the framework I have constructed it is easy to see that slop media is used just like the rest of the heap to spread out value and reduce your mental capacity.

Looking at what we consume intellectually as a diet, slop is akin to fast or junk food, but there is another type of food that is presented by society, poisoned food. All throughout our media is sprinkled aberrant ideas that confuse and confound minds so that they remain obedient and willing to suffer disgusting, horrible things as 'normal'. The examples I have to choose from are plenty. For this article I will point out this one here, inheritance.

A particular theme I have noticed in popular media is a brown, whether that be male or female, character being chosen as the successor to a previously popular white character or a white male with a female, disney is particularly hellbent on this but other companies do it as well. This, just like commercials pushing race mixed couples, is to reinforce the idea in peoples head over and over until it becomes the norm, but in the pre-modern world a passing of the torch to a foreigner or a woman in male duties would have been disgusting. This tactic of conditioning is the poison food I speak of, it creates a false reality to make you act as they wish. In this example they want you to be comfortable with giving away YOUR inheritance to foreigners or be fine with handing the reigns of civilization to women.

There, esteemed reader, in the heap is something else overlooked when discussing the mental slop the masses gobble up from their troughs, these are mantras. In the west we may know of mantras as simple repeated phrases, but they go much deeper than that. In the eighth century of our Lord Jesus Christ, in Japan, a monk by the name of Kukai elaborated on what a mantra was in a clearer way than previous Tibetan and Chinese traditions had. The elaboration given was that mantras were an auditory manifestation of a deeper reality, that is when someone repeats a mantra they are bringing the most fundamental ideas at the base of reality to our level, then transmitting them to our mind so that we may understand reality better.

I do not believe this at all but this understanding is important to know how our western society uses mantras, particularly that latter part.

"-then transmitting them to our mind so that we may understand reality better."

A mantra will plant a reality in our mind. In the Buddhist (specifically some Japanese strains) view mantras exist to convey true reality but the dominant school of thought in the west does not believe in an objective reality, but rather strives towards making a reality of its own. So instead our society uses mantras to plant a created reality in our heads.

I will discuss this in much greater detail in a future publication but for today's purpose the effect of these mantras is twofold. Firstly to focus the mind with constant repeating ideas so that it can bear the otherwise entire lack of information in the real world, the lack of aesthetic beauty and the personal 'grain' I mentioned above. The second purpose is to push potential burgeoning creation of beauty out of our minds. A society where people take extra effort to add personal touches to what they create is one where excess value cannot be harvested but also one where people may become too attached to the world they live in and wouldn't just roll over when its swept away.

We have identified the first landmark in our search but now I would like to point to an overlooked clue we may have almost overlooked, this starving cow here. Rather, its the lack of grass is has to eat, in fact there is nothing to eat between the mountains of trash.

This lack of food is the lack of substance, lack of iterative things. I think many have commented on the lack of substance in what we consume; the vast majority of online and traditionally produced content has one purpose and that is to take up attention, yet unlike a (good) book or an informative documentary or a conversation with someone this time is taken up by nothing. It's noise that you are transfixed to until you break away from it spontaneously and realize four hours have passed. The lack of any real substance in this consumption leaves your mind unworked and unchanged, so to speak it becomes an empty stomach.

To explain what I mean by 'lack of iterative things' let us look to a village in the past and we shall see what I mean. In the past in a village every building would have been built by local hands, designed by local architects; clothes would have been made by the people in the village and many designs would be made by regional clothes designers; the plates and bowls and such would have been made and designed by local craftsmen. Also the language would be more regional, small tonal differences would display a character of your area and certain phrases could identify where you were from. Towns would have their own festivals that every citizen of the town knew and participated in and the details of which would come from locals. This is all to say that all the aspects of daily life would have the imprint and variability of tens of generations and thousands of local minds. Now? There are a handful of designers in any field across the whole nation of thirty million, many of which actively want to undermine or are of foreign variety. Buildings are made by companies based, sometimes, hundreds of miles away. Few towns have local festival traditions and those who do have dwindling attendance and often have lost region specific traditions for widely disseminated ideas.

These things are done so you are made, mentally, hungry. So that you will hold the cheap trash in high regard and so that you consume much of it, also it is so there is nothing to compete with the poisoned morsels they give you. If there is no other things to choose the common man will gladly swallow rat poison rather than starve.

We have established that the design of this place is geared to starve you then fill you up with garbage that is infinitely cheaper so that excess wealth can be extracted. Yet while discussing these things I've seen another thing to lead us to the exit of this maze, an apt phrase once I point out what it is. This clue I speak of are those walls against which the trash is piled and which the paths contour to. Come, let us follow these walls while I explain their purpose.

One may say that:

'Not all real value can be destroyed! Not yet! It has been made much harder surely but you can still trudge through this trash and gather enough real and good things to sustain you.'

To which the designers of this world have already responded with these walls. Like the trash heap these walls exist physically and in the abstract realm. Let us start, unlike before, with the abstract.

When discussing walls in the abstract I mean how the acquire of information is controlled. Everyone is aware of algorithms on platforms like Youtube, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, et cetera, but often I think even the people who are aware of them underestimate how influential they are, mostly because of how plugged into them they are. I became aware of this when speaking with people with after I sort of unplugged from social media platforms, they'd ask me about very specific things as if it was common knowledge. These algorithms, in conjunction with the trash heap that makes most of what you see inane noise, can use selective messaging to make you assume a worldview without ever questioning whether there are other worldviews at all. If every time you looked up there was someone there to hold a lens over your eyes to make the sky green, you'd never even think about the sky being blue.

Algorithms not only exist on media platforms, but the way you surf the web is controlled by an algorithm, search engines selectively show you websites, they present an AI summary, they show a little box off to the side sourced from Wikipedia, they have a question with a little dropdown that answers it, all things control what information you find without any need to get rid of other information.

But its not just the web, what the news presents and how they present it is another one of these walls, through their wording implanting subliminal messages about the things they are explicitly reporting on. Also what books are stocked in libraries, and not just what books are not included but what translations of old texts are in stock.

Even further, and back to the web, is control over messaging platforms. Everyone is centralized to a handful of messaging apps that have rules that allow them to ban people, this not only controls who you talk to but what you are willingly to say, what ideas you are willing to express, and that is another form of re-direction of information.

These barriers are put up outside as well, and not necessarily in the form of literal walls. Our cities are now concrete hellscapes, not even just the large ones, but many towns now are totally hostile to life and act as just places to do business. Many speak of the lack of third places but few realize these third places were typically informed by foot traffic flow. A good example of a third place like this is a plaza or a small park. The successful of these would be placed as places to move through then they would catch people for a while before they moved on, usually for lunch. Places like this reinforced a communal sense and attached citizens to their locale; when it is nice outside you begin to perceive it as home as well. But now we lack these places and further architecture is hostile to the flow of foot traffic, but also, architecture is hostile to your eyes.

Just like third places disappearing the ugliness of modern architecture is widely discussed, I love the topic but I wont go into the details here, instead, like everything else in this weeks publication, I will tell you the purpose to it.

Think of this, as we have established the online space is full of things we deem 'slop', highly stimulating content that is empty of value, but now focus on the highly stimulating aspect, if inside our homes we are constantly plugged up to devices that provide this overstimulation it is safe to say that our minds become accustomed to it. When you take a mind accustomed to this constant stimulation and thrust them out into an ugly world with no places to comfort them, would it not naturally follow that they would retreat back to that digital world? A digital world we have already established fine tunes what information you are given? I think you understand what the purpose of hideous architecture is by now, it is so that you do not connect with the immediate world around you.

I have outlined how the modern civilization is cordoned off, both outside and in terms of the intellectual and digital world; there is one place that is a perfect culmination of both of these designs, a university.

To clarify. I do not think the idea of universities is inherently evil or subversive, china has historically used them to great effect without them subverting the foundations of their society, even integrating them as a stabilizing force. The following is an analysis of specifically how they are used in America and the west as a whole in the modern world, though I will focus specifics on America's colleges, the broad idea can be applied to basically any university in Europe or the anglosphere.

College campuses have long been extremely instrumental in the control and dissemination of ideas. Of course it is easy to see how, most jobs require a degree of some kind, the college is how you get the degree, the college controls all the information you are required to learn and forces other classes that aren't directly tied to your field of work, anyone can make the connection. Also it is easy to have read what I laid out before and conclude that the college can be used to create forced consensus on certain things, but it actually goes much deeper than that, it has been much more hands on.

Throughout the fifties and sixties the CIA planted hundreds of agents and informants in student organizations across the United States, many of who would be ranked officers in the organizations. The CIA also used several proxies to fund these organizations; the main controversy of CIA involvement during this time was centered on their monitoring of the organizations for 'potential communists'. Further, from its inception the CIA has been closely associated with academics and used college campuses to groom promising individuals.

But I believe it goes even deeper than simply gathering information and poaching talent. In the nineties and early two-thousands the FBI infiltrated right wing organizations across the nation. During these operations many tactics were used to create leverage and exert control over these organizations. I would like to focus on two distinct approaches, the use of informants in positions of power and the use of informants to redirect non-associated radicals (those who aren't FBI associated).

To start with the latter the story of the 'first SS cavalry brigade' (I am not misspelling it like they did) is probably the most apt. To make a long story short a gang of almost entirely federal informants was formed to get criminal charges on one man.

The former approach I would like to look at one Joshua Sutter and his association with the 'Atomwaffen Division'. Joshua Caleb Sutter is a confirmed FBI informant who held a leadership role in the Atomwaffen, through his position he was able to get his books, Bluebird and Iron Gates, to be listed as required reading for new recruits of the Atomwaffen. These books prophesy a post-accelerationist future where roving gangs of aryans molest children. Joshua Sutter has long created cults of entirely incompatible religions, Satanism, Hinduism, Christianity, et cetera. It is possible that he is simply insane but I believe, rather, he is being used to perform the very ideology he writes about in his little O9A manifestos, that is, to subvert every cause and increase 'chaos', but I don't think this is because he's an honest Satanist, but rather that it is just the strategy used by the FBI to justify cracking down on these groups.

In contrast to these examples the CIA used similar tactics for a different result. If you replace the coerced criminals used by the FBI with professors friendly with the CIA, the connection naturally clicks. Professors are used to redirect prospective hires into assets that will perform the same function as the professors, act as conduits for ideas beneficial to the system.

These federal assets are disease spreaders. But not of biological diseases, rather memetical diseases. To keep it brief, think of ideas as living beings that transmit between people. When thinking in this framework it becomes easy to understand how colleges are used as the perfect culmination of this megastructure we have analyzed. The trash spreads out value, the lack of nutrition makes man hungry, the walls redirect man, and finally colleges are nodes at which man can eat food, knowledge, that is infected, detrimental to his free will.

But why is all of this done? What is the driving reason for this vast terraforming we have investigated? Where do all these clues lead? Dear reader I must thank you for following me on this investigation so far so I will finally tell you my conclusion.

Simply put all of this is to turn you into an animal so that you may be controlled. Man, when his basic needs are met, looks to higher things, he becomes more well connected, he refines his craft, he builds a network of familiarity and control separate from that of the current system. This very thing, for most which is simply living a happy self focused life, is poison to our system. If you are not starved, if you care about your home, you will not chase pleasure or shirk from pain and therefore are less easily controlled, more likely to resist.

Quite the daunting structure to topple, like the last article I will have a hard time in my prescription, but unlike the last article it will not simply be "wait for something". You can take some action now, and in fact, you have a lot of action to take going forward.

So to you I prescribe: Being now aware of the tactics used to reduce your mind to that of an animal's you must separate from this structure. The prescription is great in size so I will break it down into sections.

Regarding slop you must separate from short form content. I personally got rid of my cell phone entirely, but the point is to reduce the amount of noise you're jamming into your brain. With down time you will reflect on everything you have experienced throughout the day and become a much more aware person, with new silence in your mind you will be able to orient yourself more properly. This extends further to all things you use to distract yourself during the day, background music, shorts, scrolling social media, et cetera. It is all trash forced into your mind. This is not to say stop listening to music but try to make it a focused activity.

Regarding subversive media it is enough to be reflective of the purpose of what you are seeing. But further I would recommend hardening your mind against subversive ideas by building a basic philosophical basis. When you have a core guiding principle corrosive ideas do not have room to be slipped in. This defense also works against the many mantras.

Regarding physical trash I recommend bit by bit replacing the worthless plastic crap you use with antiques, also take time to learn about the antiques you buy, their history and how to care for them. Following this, study a bit and become aware of your home and what things you would really want in it. Expressing yourself in interior design creates a personal world that grounds you. Speaking of a personal world that grounds you only little can be done about the lack of places to tie you to your area, but still I would recommend on your days off, instead of always scrolling and gaming, walk around your area and explore.

The most important advice however is to remain calm and do not rush. Reorienting yourself will take time and it will be very quiet. A piece of recommended reading I'll give you, which is an antithesis of a design made to isolate you from life, is A Cup of Sake Beneath The Cherry Trees by Yoshida Kenko.

With this I end my triumvirate introduction. Going forward the articles will be a bit lighter and not as tangential to one another. I plan this periodical to run for at the very least a year or longer, hope to see you next time.

Author's comments:

I cycle my weekends between a 'weekend in action' and 'a weekend in idleness'. The weekend in action is a weekend where I schedule everything social to happen, friend hangouts, calls, meetings, lunches, et cetera, it is also where I schedule most of my non-work duties. The weekend in idleness is a weekend where I mostly do leisure activities, light shopping, book hunting, browsing antique stores, gardening, baking, et cetera. As of writing this, May fifteenth, it is a weekend in idleness, one I am particularly excited for too as this weekend I get to catch up on the spring Grand Sumo Tournament.

The Achilles Strait

In this weeks article I would like to discuss recent events, rather, that recent events are another reason we should rely as little as possible on international trade. I will discuss statistics but please forgive me if some things are off, I have tried to understand the situation but there are deadlines and I am not a professional economist. I am sure you can guess that I am talking about the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and I am sure that anyone reading this in the future was smart enough to cross reference the publication date and events that happened around that time.

The Strait of Hormuz is a transit point for about thirty-percent of the worlds crude oil, twenty-nine percent of the worlds liquefied petroleum, nineteen percent of the world liquefied natural gas, and nineteen percent of the world refined oil products, of that refined product is thirty percent of the worlds already dwindling helium supply. The strait is also a transit for almost forty percent of the United States' urea, a fertilizer, forty percent of our aluminum, and a considerable deal of cement.

I am sure you understand now the strait is how a crucial amount of materials get to the United States. The biggest focus seems to be oil products, which is understandable since this is the most immediate price hike Americans saw, but with the strait being closed our societies infrastructure in its entirety is at risk.

This is not the first failing of trade either. I am sure everyone remembers the Suez Canal blockage, a single ship causing billions in losses and significant delays, I'm also sure some of you remember the threat Houthi rebels posed to global trade too. Since entering the twenty-twenties being a ship captain going through middle eastern waterways must be at least slightly nerve racking.

But even long long before our time international trade was a weak point for the nations that used it. In the bronze age from Greece to Saudi Arabia to Egypt there was a large trade network to produce bronze but also to transport grain, to the point of reliance to avoid famine.

"The gates of the house are sealed. Since there is famine in your house, we will starve to death. If you do not hasten to come we will starve to death. A living soul of your country you will no longer see."

Was a letter found from the time the bronze age as trade networks collapsed. As cities fell to the sea peoples other nations in the region collapsed as the trade network ceased to supply them.

Back to the modern day not only do trade disruptions threaten our nation, but even relying on other nations presents a critical risk to national security. As I said before the bronze age network collapsing collapsed nations that relied on foreign goods. Today America has a similar risk in rare earths from China.

We have seen recently with the trade war that America relies so heavily on China's rare earths that a deal was made to not raise tariffs on them, but even before China has used rare earths as a weapon against Japan. In the past China 'failed' to renew a trade license for rare earth to japan resulting in widespread panic since they are relied upon so heavily. After the license was renewed Japan, smartly, rushed to develop technologies that did not rely on rare earths, to stockpile rare earths, and increase domestic refinement. America has taken similar measures by pouring money into a rare earths mine in California that shut down during the Obama era, but it is still not operational, these things take time.

You, the reader, may be asking what my point is with all of this; I did not give a very in depth analysis of the Strait of Hormuz situation and all those others are far from current events. Well this is a nationalist publication and a very relevant concern is national security. The more we rely on international trade the greater leverage other nations have over us. What if we were to begin tearing down mosques and the middle east decided to cut off all trade flowing in their waterways? What if China decided to cut off our rare earths? Some economists may say that rare earths in sheer monetary value are a small percentage of trade but not having access to rare earths would make prices for everything skyrocket, and as there are rare earth shortages the price of rare earths would balloon. What if trade was cut during a war?

Trade reliance also worsens economic conditions, even in peace time, for the worker. Wealth flows out of a nation from imports, that is wealth that could have flowed back to the worker via wages. The domestic worker also has less bargaining power when, well, they have no job to begin with! There's no worker rights without scarcity of workers.

But what should be done? Well you, dear reader, must reinstate the Shah of Iran. No I kid. You, obviously, cannot go out and do something yourself. But broadly we must produce as much domestically as we can, not everything can be, and you should not worry about domestic production raising prices because the wealth the worker gets would be higher. Yet, I do not feel that is a good enough answer, so I will give a specific solution to the largest issue we have with trade, oil shortages.

So, to the nation I prescribe: Two things. The nation should invest in a great pipeline from the Gulf of America to the pacific ocean. If there is a large pipeline, rather many many pipelines part of the same super-structure, ships do not have to worry about shipping across the volatile middle eastern canals and straits. There should also be great investment into transporting oil, gas, et cetera, from either ocean into the nations inland.

This should also come with greater investment for over land transportation of goods. We already invest a great deal in overland supply chains, but what I mean is specifically between our gulf and pacific shores so that not only oil but all manner of goods have a way to traverse from America to the two oceans cheaply. A significant part of the ability to produce cheap goods in China is their robust publicly available infrastructure.

The second thing I shall prescribe is a good deal more radical. The president called on domestic producers to increase production while the strait was closed, but they refused, rightly I might add as it takes weeks or even months to get these things going. But, we should not have to call for this in the first place, our oil and gas should be primarily drilled and refined domestically.

This same vulnerability reared its head for the south during the civil war. Jefferson Davis called on plantation owners to grow food for the war but they continued to grow cash crops and hoarded them for when the war was over. Simply put, a person who owns the means of production has a duty to their nation before profits, yet we tell and expect these companies to only work off of profit incentives. This greedy way of ordering society drove another knife into the south and during this crisis has wounded our nation again.

So my second prescription is that we must expect national duties from our companies. It is because of the infrastructure paid for by the taxpayer, the army of citizens who die for our peace, and the civic servants that keep law and order that these companies can exist and profit as handsomely as they do, when you consider all the public does for them it isn't unreasonable for them to act patriotically for the greater good of the nation.

Author's comments:

Nigger

The Bluebonnet Gazetteer

Conservatives & Reality

The Right is Run by Those who Hate You

The Design of Atomization

The Achilles Strait