Conservatives & Reality
You are now reading the Bluebonnet Gazetteer, a periodical primarily to advocate for a white, christian, and nationalist America, but may include any subject this author finds important to speak on. This periodical is published on a bi-weekly basis, and at the time this is being written only distributed digitally. I hope that in time this periodical will be an indispensable piece of regular reading for those youth who wish to reclaim and perfect our American nation.
The "conservative" bloc is impotent. The persistent belief that ones entire life is solely in their hands has gone from a small growth, one that professes that elevating your position in life is possible through hard work, to a noticeable and malignant tumor, which spits vile poison at young men who even mention the fact that there is no feasible way to provide for a family, if they could start one at all!
This deep seated memetic poison has now frozen the majority of the American right wing into a state where no one will address the structural issues that are degrading the traditions they bemoan dying out. No meaningful change is ever proposed, and any suggestion that we must actually shape society to attain the ends we seek is met with almost more hostility than is given to the enemy. They are only capable of reacting to the left wing and fighting for popular policies they decided over a decade ago were "right wing", and of course for Israel.
Hereafter I will give three exhibits pressing issues for the most important bloc of citizens in this nation, young white men, and how this thinking makes these actual issues unapproachable for the republican party.
A common issue brought up in right wing circles is porn addiction, specifically among young men. This issue, moreso than a sign of something systemically wrong, is treated as an almost unforgivable personal moral failing by young men and is used to brow beat them whenever the obviously more corrosive issue of women's fornication is brought up. You will hear all sort of shaming and hen pecking that men need to "work through" this and oft time it will be used as a sort of equalizer if someone points out the imbalanced deal of a conservative young man having to settle with a roastie who "left it in her past." But this is only a strategy, one which I will elaborate on next article.
Instead, as I see it, the pervasive porn addiction afflicting young men should be looked at as a symptom of something deeper. Between 1978 and 1981 the Canadian psychologist Bruce K. Alexander ran an experiment with rats and morphine. He speculated that keeping rats in a sterile and cramped cage made them more prone to addiction. To test this he assembled four groups of rats that either lived permanently in a large communal cage with activities, lived alone in a typical lab cage, or switched between the two environments, in these cages rats had the choice between fresh or morphine laced water. In every case the rats that had been isolated were more prone to addiction, furthermore when rats went from a lab cage to the more comfortable communal cage with other rats they almost entirely dropped morphine water, and the rats who lived only in the communal cage were seemingly resistant to allure of the morphine water, trying it only occasionally.
Today young white men cannot expect increased future wages, do not have communities, as they were too pesky and isolated the replacement races, and cannot even expect to get a girlfriend, much less a lifelong loyal partner. These circumstances are far worse than the sterile lab cages yet those who would expect you to let them decide the fate of the nation expect young white men to simply be unaffected and act like they can still expect these benefits. This is not an excuse of porn addiction, it is a corrosive drug all the same like meth or gambling and young men should rise above it, but the undead neocons and the women who paint themselves with right wing colors are beyond stupid in their expectation.
As very briefly mentioned before not only is it rightly unexpected for a young man to get a relationship now, but holding one is an issue as well. You have heard countless times about divorce rates, ghosting, regular breakups, and this reprehensible, disgusting, evil thing being called a "situationship" (ie being a whore). The conservative bloc, those who would care if a migrant is legal or not, blame this on people simply not being old fashioned and, for some reason they could not tell you, abandoning the old morality. But people do not do things for no reason, as much as the cult of "progress" would like you to believe that things just change, change is in fact enacted by people. Ignoring that in their idleness the boomer generation upheld no real load bearing traditions, it is easy to point out that the laws passed in their time lead to the thing they lament, and these very laws they defend!
No fault divorce means there is nothing wrong with breaking a vow that includes "till death do us part," abortion means that there is no responsibility to usher in new life with the person you chose to sleep with to continue society, birth control means that sex is not a sacred act between a man and a woman whose souls are one but instead it is purely hedonistic pleasure, gay marriage means marriage is nothing, it means nothing anymore and is just a label, anti-discrimination laws means there is no group preference and that society is not built on its own iteration which you buy into so that it protects your blood, but instead is a cold equalizing force and economic zone. So how can you expect relationships to form and last when the laws society mandates act against such a thing?
When analyzed, the before complaint that the youth do not have "old fashioned values," in regards to marriage, seems entirely insane because the previous generations raised the youth to not even know what the traditions are. Yet once again they will hen peck men to simply pick up where they expect them to, to fabricate the thing they expect from thin air built entirely on nothing at all.
But to circle back to boomers not upholding any load bearing traditions, the newest generation of young white men and women have not been exposed to traditions which served the purpose of instilling in them morality and a preference for their own; they have endlessly been subjected to dogmas of equality and moral irreverence. Because of this there has been a deep hollowing of the soul that has left women insane and men melancholic.
Yet the older generations of the right wing, and those young who adhere to the GOP lines, usually mixed or hispanic, bemoan the loss of "American values" and make calls to "preserve our culture," but what culture? When pressed often these people will only be able to pin down manufactured propaganda from the late nineteenth century as the culture and values they want to preserve, but these were never the traditions settlers and early Americans passed down.
In Laws, and to a lesser degree in Republic, Plato explains that festivals and gymnasium are there to instill in the youth a sense of community and bodily health, but also they are there as lessons to instill morality in them, so that as they age and do critique society they are still rightly ordered. Instead the young whites of America from the youngest age are directly thrown into questioning their own society and anything resembling the gymnasium or festivals or analogous traditions are left entirely unknown.
Further this bloc of the right wing is openly hostile to many traditions of the home, that is furnishing, cooking, baking, gardening, et cetera, the things that enrich your dwelling and really give you a connection to it. They are also aggressive to any tradition of grooming (except the kind rich jews do), and they, through apathy and laziness, decay traditions that were unique to a single locale. Of all of these they lob insults of being homosexual or pointless or outdated, a very ironic insult; they will make excuses that upholding tradition takes too much effort or time or they take away from more 'productive' things. Then if they do do one thing, halfheartedly usually, they expect compensation for it as if traditions were merely capitalist exchanges of value.
How can we let people like this determine the direction of the right wing? How is it congruent that the 'conservative' bloc is so antithetical to actual tradition that their defining ethic contributes to the decay of the society they claim should be preserved? It is quite ironic that, in their rabid pursuit of extreme individual responsibility, they snatched up the benefits from a previous system, that did not believe this, then shirked any real responsibility of their own, now those they preach to about this ideal are left to be crushed under the collapsing roof of America.
But it would not do to simply address this issue, what use would it be? Instead I will at least try to prescribe some form of action to remedy it. A very daunting task, especially after my railing against the masters of "fix it yourself," but I do think we have a responsibility ourselves, rather a collective responsibility.
You, the reader, cannot "just do something" that will fix this issue, I think I made this quite clear at the beginning that I thought this. But to mirror that we can look near the end of this essay for some type of guidance. Those who spew the party lines have one great failing, they have not preserved the culture, they know nothing about it even!
So to you I prescribe: because to be right wing means to uphold and continue and defend the traditions of your forefathers, you must become a scholar of American society, and further European society, specifically a small facet of it, for now. Pick something from everyday life, no no too many of you are choosing video games, choose something else, and learn about it. Do not watch a summary on Youtube, preferably go to your local library, if you cant, web-surf obscure websites anything but centralized algorithm driven platforms, and pick a book from the nonfiction section about whatever you choose. There are innumerable things to choose from, cheese, ginseng root, lamps, painting, a genre of music, regional history, furniture, specialized electronics, architecture, public planning, organic gardening, a local art scene (in your area!), even if it died, and so many more innumerable options. Learn its evolution and nuances and how it inter-played with foreign iterations or iterations from other regions in America; the citizens of America have forgotten how deep and rich our culture is, remember it.